Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 7;6(1):200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.10.031

Table 2.

Comparison of electrolyte components, volume, and osmolarity between commercial fluids and GSTT formulas 1 and 2

Electrolyte concentration (mmol/L) Fluids compatible with citrate-based anticoagulation
Fluids compatible with noncitrate anticoagulation
Fluid based on GSTT formula 1 Fluid based on GSTT formula 2
CiCa K2 CiCa K4 Prism0Cal (Baxter) Pureflow (NxStage) MultiBic (Fresenius) Prismasol (Baxter) Accusol (Nikkiso) Pureflow (NxStage)
Na+ 133 133 140 140 140 140 140 140 128 135
K+ 2 4 2–4 0–4 0–4 0–4 0–4 0–4
Mg2+ 0.75 0.75 0.5–0.75 0.75 0.5 0.75 0.5 0.5–0.75
Ca2+ 0 0 1.5 1.25–1.75 1.75 0–1.5
HCO3 20 20 22 25 35 32 35 35 25 28
Cl 116.5 118.5 108–120.5 108.5–120.5 111–113 109–113 109.5–113.5 109–113 102.7 107
PO42−
Glucose 5.55 5.55 6.1 5.55 5.55 5.55 5.55 5.55
Volume (L) 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3.6
Theoretical osmolarity (mOsm/L) 278 282 286–296 286–294 292–300 292–300 292–300 292–300 256 270

Ca2+, calcium; CiCa, citrate and calcium; Cl, chloride; GSTT, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust; HCO3, bicarbonate; K+, potassium; Mg2+, magnesium; Na+, sodium; PO42−, phosphate.