Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;99(11):5252–5260. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.051

Table 3.

The effects of probiotic on bone traits of 43-day-old broilers subjected to daily cycling heating episodes.

Item Control Probiotic SEM P value
Tibia
 BMD (g/cm2) 0.167 0.176 0.001 0.07
 BMC (g) 2.05 2.44 0.02 0.001
 Area (cm2) 12.23 13.91 0.12 0.003
 Weight (g) 6.50 9.04 0.22 0.01
 Relative weight1 (g/kg) 3.37 4.09 0.09 0.07
 Length (mm) 92.11 93.50 0.44 0.44
 Width (mm) 8.17 9.31 0.11 0.02
 Medial thickness (mm) 1.07 1.14 0.01 0.15
 Lateral thickness (mm) 1.61 1.60 0.02 0.91
 Weight/length index (mg/mm) 70.29 96.87 2.37 0.01
 Robusticity index (g, cm) 5.00 4.52 0.04 0.02
Femur
 BMD (g/cm2) 0.142 0.145 0.001 0.56
 BMC (g) 1.33 1.55 0.02 0.01
 Area (cm2) 9.38 10.75 0.11 0.01
 Weight (g) 5.42 7.45 0.22 0.03
 Relative weight1 (g/kg) 2.80 3.38 0.09 0.13
 Length (mm) 69.33 71.33 0.37 0.20
 Width (mm) 8.51 9.19 0.09 0.07
 Medial thickness (mm) 1.41 1.27 0.03 0.25
 Lateral thickness (mm) 1.41 1.50 0.02 0.38
 Weight/length index (mg/mm) 77.85 103.74 2.66 0.03
 Robusticity index (g, cm) 3.99 3.68 0.03 0.03

Least square means were presented (n = 12).

Abbreviations: BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density.

1

Relative weight was calculated as bone weight in g divided by body weight in kg.