Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;62:103096. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103096

Table 3.

Predictive performances of various models in all-risk and moderate-risk (FRS: 3–6) groups of Discovery and validation cohorts.

All risk C-statistic (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)
CT-FRS (Full model)
 Discovery 0.828 (0.784–0.872) 79.0 (76.9–81.0) 76.8 (69.0–84.6) 79.4 (76.2–82.6)
 Validation 0.804 (0.732–0.877) 68.0 (64.9–71.2) 86.1 (74.8–97.4) 65.3 (59.2–71.3)
CT-FRS (Simplified model)
 Discovery 0.825 (0.782–0.868) 78.3 (75.1–81.2) 75.9 (67.9–83.9) 78.7 (75.4–81.9)
 Validation 0.807 (0.739–0.875) 62.9 (59.7–66.0) 91.7 (82.6–100.0) 58.5 (52.2–64.8)
FRS
 Discovery 0.794 (0.752–0.835) 71.2 (68.1–74.2) 76.8 (69.0–84.6) 70.1 (66.5–73.8)
 Validation 0.741 (0.663–0.819) 53.3 (50.1–56.5) 91.7 (82.6–100.0) 47.5 (41.1–53.8)
a-FRS
 Discovery 0.792 (0.760–0.821) 74.6 (70.9–78.0) 73.2 (64.0–81.1) 74.9 (71.3–78.3)
 Validation 0.716 (0.658–0.768) 57.7 (52.1–63.3) 86.1 (70.5–95.3) 53.4 (46.8–59.9)

Moderate risk C-statistic (95% CI) Accuracy (95% CI) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI)

CT-FRS (Full model)
 Discovery 0.746 (0.696–0.791) 67.9 (65.8–70.1) 80.5 (70.3–88.4) 64.0 (57.8–69.8)
 Validation 0.719 (0.618–0.819) 73.3 (71.0–75.6) 65.5 (45.7–82.1) 75.2 (66.4–82.7)
CT-FRS (Simplified model)
 Discovery 0.729 (0.678–0.775) 65.6 (63.5–67.7) 78.0 (67.5–86.4) 61.6 (55.4–67.6)
 Validation 0.722 (0.626–0.819) 73.3 (71.0–75.6) 62.1 (42.3–79.3) 76.1 (67.3–83.5)
FRS
 Discovery 0.626 (0.573–0.678) 58.2 (57.1–59.4) 69.5 (58.4–79.2) 54.7 (48.4–60.8)
 Validation 0.573 (0.455–0.69) 69.9 (68.6–71.1) 37.9 (20.7–57.7) 77.8 (69.2–84.9)
a-FRS
 Discovery 0.649 (0.596–0.700) 52.9 (46.4–58.8) 80.5 (70.3–88.4) 44.2 (38.0 - 50.5)
 Validation 0.530 (0.445–0.613) 41.1 (35.0–47.4) 82.8 (64.2–94.2) 30.8 (22.6 - 40.0)

Data expressed as fraction or% (95% CI).

Abbreviations: CT-FRS, CT-adjusted Fistula Risk Score (FRS); CI, confidence interval; a-FRS, alternative FRS.