Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;25(11):e1732–e1742. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0518

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for clinical benefit rate (n = 152)

Variable CBR, % Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Experimental therapy
IO monotherapy 28.8 Ref
IO combination 38.7 1.56 0.781–3.194 .214
Age
<65 29.2 Ref
≥65 47.8 2.22 1.086–4.552 .029 2.91 1.16–7.31 .023
Sex
Female 26.7 Ref
Male 46.8 2.42 1.226–4.828 .011 2.19 0.91–5.24 .079
PS ECOG
0 37.0 Ref
≥1 32.4 0.81 0.414–1.591 .549
Visceral metastases
No 43.9 Ref
Yes 31.5 0.59 0.282–1.235 .158
Metastatic site
≤2 45.5 Ref
>2 20.3 0.31 0.142–0.628 .002 0.5 0.2–1.25 .139
Prior lines of therapy
≤2 43.5 Ref
>2 21.7 0.36 0.167–0.739 .007 0.43 0.15–1.19 .105
LDH
<ULN 51.6 Ref
>ULN 20.8 0.25 0.104–0.550 <.001 0.25 0.1–0.62 .003
NLR
<6 33.6 Ref
≥6 40.7 1.36 0.567–3.167 .481
dNLR
<3 35.5 Ref
≥3 30.0 0.78 0.314–1.803 .568
PLR
<300 32.2 Ref
≥300 43.2 1.61 0.745–3.429 .221
LMR
<3 33.6 Ref
≥3 39.4 1.28 0.570–2.825 .538
Albumin
≤3.5 26.3 Ref
>3.5 36.1 1.58 0.566–5.135 .406

Abbreviations: CBR, clinical benefit rate; CI, confidence interval; dNLR, derived neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; IO, immunotherapy; LMR, lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio; OR, odds ratio; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; PLR, platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; PS ECOG, performance status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ULN, upper limit of normal.