Table 4.
Outcomes for preclinical models of treatment or prevention of GVHD
Study | Model | Survival (I vs C) | GVHD Clinical score (I vs C) | Skin score (I vs C) | Histology (I vs C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[23] | Treatment | 16 vs 10 d (p < 0.01) | 2.8 vs 3.5 at 10 d (p < 0.01)a | Severe, 60% vs 89% |
Large boweld: 7 vs 12 (p < 0.01) at 6 d Liver/small bowel: no difference at 6 d |
[24] | Treatment | 48 vs 34 d (p NR) | 3 vs 6 at 50 d (p NR)b | 2.5 vs 3.5 at 50 d (p NR)c |
Liver, lung, skin: Improved Fibrosis: Liver: 5% vs 20% (p < 0.05) Lung: 6% vs 15% (p < 0.05) Skin: 30% vs 75% (p < 0.01) |
[25] | Prevention | 25 vs 22 d (p < 0.05) | 4 vs 8 at 24 d (p < 0.05)e | NR | NR |
[26] | Prevention | 60 vs 36 d (p < 0.01) | 2 vs 10 at 56 days (p < 0.001)f | NR | Liver, large intestine, skin: Improved |
aClinical score at 10 days: 0 (good) to 2 (poor) for weight loss, posture, activity, fur texture and skin integrity and summed for a total score of 0–10
bClinical score: Skin, body weight and hunch. Maximum total score = 7.9
cSkin score: Minimum score 0; maximum score 3.9
dHistology score: Maximum total score of 28 for the large bowel and small bowel, and 40 for the liver
eMean combined disease activity index: Grade 0/1/2 assigned to weight loss, posture, activity, fur texture, skin integrity and paleness. Maximum total score = 1
fClinical score: Grade 0/1/2 assigned to weight loss, posture, activity, fur texture and skin integrity. Maximum total score = 10