Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;216(3):735–752. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303533

Figure 5.

Figure 5

NREMS delta power following sleep deprivation is increased more strongly in Tfap2a+/− mice but less strongly in Tfap2b+/− mice. (A) NREMS time change in Tfap2a+/−, two-way ANOVA tests followed by Sidak’s pairwise comparison, the main effect of genotype: F(1, 30) = 0.103, P = 0.750; the main effect of time, F(2, 30) = 0.791, P = 0.791. (B) Average NREMS bout duration change in Tfap2a+/−, two-way ANOVA tests followed by Sidak’s pairwise comparison, the main effect of genotype: F(1, 30) = 0.072, P = 0.790; the main effect of time, F(2, 30) = 1.407, P = 0.261. (C) NREMS delta power changes (0.5–25 Hz) in Tfap2a+/− mice. Z06-12: 0.5–25 Hz, ****P < 0.0001. Z12-18: 0.5–10 Hz, P = 0.334; 10–25 Hz, ****P < 0.0001. Z18–24: 0.5–5 Hz, P = 0.334; 5–25 Hz, ****P < 0.0001. (D) NREMS time change in Tfap2b+/−, two-way ANOVA tests followed by Sidak’s pairwise comparison, the main effect of genotype: F(1, 33) = 0.595, P = 0.446; the main effect of time, F(2, 33) = 3.008, P = 0.063. (E) Average NREMS bout duration change in Tfap2b+/−, two-way ANOVA tests followed by Sidak’s pairwise comparison, the main effect of genotype: F(1, 33) = 0.014, P = 0.906; the main effect of time, F(2, 33) = 1.476, P = 0.243. (F) NREMS delta power changes (0.5–25 Hz) in Tfap2b+/− mice. Z06–12: 0.5–25Hz, ****P < 0.0001. Z12–18: 0.5–25 Hz, P = 0.715. Z18–24: 0.5–25 Hz, ****P < 0.0001. n = 5 for Tfap2a+/+, n = 7 for Tfap2a+/−, n = 7 for Tfap2b+/+, n = 6 for Tfap2b+/−. Wilcoxon two-sided signed-rank tests were used for power changes in (C and F). BSL, baseline sleep; R, recovery sleep. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM.