Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;10:19267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76035-z

Table 2.

Effect of different scenarios onnet returns, water use, water productivity and energy use efficiency of rice, maize, wheat and systems (based on 4-years’ mean, 2014–2018.

Scenariosa Net returns (USD ha−1) Irrigation water use (mm ha−1) Irrigation water productivity (kg grain m−3) Energy use efficiency (MJ−1 MJ−1)
Rice/maize Wheat System Rice/maize Wheat System Rice/maize Wheat System Rice/maize Wheat System
Sc1 835BCb 974C 1810C 2173A 454A 2627A 0.30C 1.21C 0.42C 3.95C 7.44C 5.05E
Sc2 946AB 1192A 2138AB 1759B 448A 2207B 0.39C 1.34B 0.52C 4.70C 9.65AB 6.23D
Sc3 945AB 1125AB 2070B 1753B 458A 2211B 0.38C 1.28BC 0.51C 4.85C 9.26B 6.25D
Sc4 741C 1005BC 1747C 316C 448A 764CD 2.25AB 1.23BC 2.23AB 10.81B 7.84C 9.25C
Sc5 991A 1167A 2158AB 289C 403B 692D 2.59A 1.48A 2.56A 13.82A 10.05A 11.92A
Sc6 935AB 1140A 2075B 359C 456A 815CD 2.06B 1.29BC 2.09B 12.68A 9.27B 10.95B
Sc7 985A 1175A 2261A 365C 451A 953C 2.15B 1.32BC 2.09B 12.72A 9.51AB 10.26B

aRefer Table 4 for scenarios description.

bMeans followed by a similar uppercase letters within a column are not significantly different at 0.05 level of probability using Tukey’s HSD test.