Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;2020:9869851. doi: 10.1155/2020/9869851

Table 4.

Specific risk of bias assessment.

Study name Reid Linsenmeyer Waites Lee Hess Sappal
Year 2001 2004 2004 2007 2008 2018
Groups balanced for lesion level/urine collection Yes 0.1 Yes 0.1 Unbalanced catheterization (treatment/control 65.4/36.3%) No data for each of the 4 arms Yes 0.1 Not reported
UTI diagnosis including autonomic dysreflexia No Yes 0.1 No Yes 0.1 Yes 0.1 No
Comorbidity and drug use specified No No No No No No
Proper control Yes 0.3 Yes 0.3 Yes 0.3 Placebo+MH Yes 0.3 Yes 0.3
Compliance assessment No No Pills' count 0.1 No Pills' count 0.1 No
Dietary record No No Only fluid intake 0.03 No No No
Food antioxidant intake Only no CB/vit. C 0.025 Only no CB 0.025 Only no CB 0.025 No No Only no CB 0.025
Washout and/or run-in 2d-w/o only Yes 0.05 No No No No
Marker of bioavailability No No No No No No
Double blinding No Yes 0.05 Yes 0.05 Yes 0.05 Yes 0.05 Yes 0.05
No funding support Yes 0.03 (no conflict) Yes 0.03 Yes 0.03 Brucia Pharmaceuticals Yes 0.03 Yes (critical versus sponsor) 0.03
No supplement donation Yes 0.01 Kessler Pharmacy AIM This Way Yes 0.01 Cran-Max Swiss Yes 0.01
Quality score (range 0–1) 0.465 0.655 0.535 0.16 0.68 0.415

CB: cranberry; MH: methenamine hippurate; UTI: urinary tract infection.