Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2020 Nov 20;73(2):713–725. doi: 10.1002/hep.31309

Table 2.

Implemented Interventions and Subsequent Outcomes

Author, year Study Setting Study
Period
Intervention Outcome Pre-Intervention
[n (%)]
Post-Intervention
[n (%)]
Absolute
Difference
Relative
Difference
Aberra 2013a U. Michigan, USA 2008-2011 Nurse base protocol One-time abdominal imaging 119/160b (74.4) 331/355 (93.2) 18.8% 25.3%
Kennedy, 2013 Flinders Medical Center, Australia 2007-2009 PCP and patient education, system redesignb Semi-annual US and AFP for two years 0/22 (0) 14/22 (63.6) 63.6% -
Beste, 2015 Northwest Veterans Affairs, USA 2011-2012 EMR Reminder ≥2 abdominal imaging within 18 months 103/564 (18.2) 218/790 (27.6) 9.4% 51.6%
Del Poggio, 2015 120 PCPs, Italy 1994-2013 PCP Education HCC diagnosed by surveillance 85/244 (34.8) 105/190 (55.3) 20.5% 58.9%
Nazareth 2016 Royal Perth Hospital, Australia 2010-2015 Nurse-led clinic Semi-annual ultrasound - 40/76 (52.6) - -
Farrell 2017 Royal Liverpool Hospital, UK 2009-2013 Radiology led recall Semi-annual US - 368/804 (45.8) - -
Bui 2017 KP Northern California, USA Not reported EMR identification and physician extender 3 abdominal imaging in 2 years 51/224 (22.8) 183/224 (81.7) 58.9% 258.3%
Singal, 2019 Parkland, Dallas, TX 2014-2016 Mailed outreach Semi-annual US over 18 months 44/600 (7.3) 247/1200 (20.6) 13.3% 182.2%

PCP - primary care provider; HCC - hepatocellular carcinoma; US - ultrasound; AFP - alpha fetoprotein; EMR – electronic medical reminder

a

Singal 2011 provides the comparison cohort for the intervention

b

System redesign, creation of hepatitis nurse for coordinating surveillance and a patient database with automated recall function