TABLE III:

Quantitative results obtained from the different methods on the de novo labeled dataset. The best result is shown in bold. The individual C, A, and L values are listed parenthetically.

Methods	AUC ROC	AUC PR	Max DC	CAL (C, A, L)
SFAT [15]	-	-	0.559	0.328 (0.999, 0.664, 0.495)
MSMA [1]	-	-	0.644	0.409 (0.999, 0.713, 0.574)
VDGAN [3]	0.954	0.849	0.747	0.710 (0.981, 0.871, 0.832)
Prop. + UNet	0.958	0.852	0.756	0.726 (0.986, 0.881, 0.836)
Prop. + NestUNet	0.955	0.855	0.761	0.687 (0.983, 0.846, 0.825)
Prop. + GAN	0.951	0.861	0.768	0.732 (0.995, 0.879, 0.837)