. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 8.

Published before final editing as: IEEE Trans Image Process. 2020 May 8:10.1109/TIP.2020.2991530. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2020.2991530

TABLE IV:

Quantitative results obtained from different methods on the DRIsfahanCFnFA dataset. The best result is shown in bold. The individual C, A, and L values are listed parenthetically.

Methods	AUC ROC	AUC PR	Max DC	Max CAL (C, A, L)
SFAT [15]	-	-	0.607	0.432 (0.991, 0.655, 0.656)
MSMA [1]	-	-	0.691	0.504 (0.999, 0.720, 0.688)
VDGAN [3]	0.965	0.851	0.776	0.728 (0.996, 0.868, 0.840)
Prop. + UNet	0.972	0.883	0.802	0.743 (0.997, 0.878, 0.847)
Prop. + NestUNet	0.972	0.882	0.804	0.761 (0.997, 0.889, 0.858)
Prop. + GAN	0.974	0.887	0.808	0.783 (0.997, 0.899, 0.872)