Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 26;43(12):1910–1917. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02622-2

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics in the post-UFE infection group vs the background UFE population

Characteristic Infection patients
(n = 25)
Background UFE population P value
Age, n = 333 49 (44–53)+ 48 (45–51)+ 0.580a
Parity, n = 301
 Nulliparous 5 (23%) 120 (43%) 0.102b
 Parity ≥ 1 17 (77%) 159 (57%)
Presence of menorrhagia, n = 326
 Yes 23 (92%) 259 (86%) 0.775c
 No 2 (8%) 42 (14%)
Presence of pressure symptoms, n = 319
 Yes 18 (78%) 222 (75%) 0.120c
 No 5 (22%) 74 (25%)
Anterior wall fat (cm), n = 234 4.5 (2.8–6.6)+ 3.2 (2.5–4.0)+ 0.012a
Number of fibroids, n = 286
  ≤ 8 fibroids 13 (59%) 137 (52%) 0.669b
  > 8 fibroids 9 (41%) 127 (48%)
Dominant fibroid diameter (cm), n = 286 7.8 (5.8–11.0) 7.0 (5.5–9.5) 0.181a
Dominant fibroid type, n = 286
 Submucosal 2 (9%) 16 (6%) N/A
 Intramural 14 (64%) 187 (71%)
 Subserosal 6 (27%) 61 (23%)
Presence of a submucosal component, n = 286
 Yes 9 (41%) 115 (44%) 0.986b
 No 13 (59%) 149 (56%)
Fibroid load in the endometrial cavity (cm), n = 286 0 (0–1.70)+ 0 (0–2.53)+ 0.583a
Uterine volume (cm3), n = 286 1165 (540–1721)+ 825 (527–1204)+ 0.049a
Amount of embolisation agent (vials), n = 179
  ≤ 4 vials 5 (38%) 105 (63%) 0.141b
  > 4 vials 8 (62%) 61 (37%)
Size of embolisation particles (microns),n = 255
  ≤ 500 14 (70%) 182 (77%) 0.630b
  > 500 6 (30%) 53 (33%)

+denotes where continuous data presented as median (interquartile range), all other categorical data are presented as number of patients (percentage). The number of patients for which data were available is indicated in the first column

aDenotes where Mann–Whitney-U tests were used for statistical analysis

bDenotes where Chi-squared tests on independence used for statistical analysis. Yates’ continuity correction was used when there were less than 3 categories. cDenotes where Fisher exact test was used

Due to an incomplete data set, not all patients could be included in all analyses