Table 2.
The Relationship Between the Value of Self-Efficacy and the Sociodemographic Characteristics on Admission to the Ward (T1)
| Characteristics | Category | M ± SD | p | post hoc | Effect size [95% CI]* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female Male |
27.9 ± 10.0 28.8 ± 9.2 |
0.62 | −0.098 [−0.51 - −0.31] |
| Age | ≥60 >60 |
25.5 ± 10.0 31.3 ± 8.1 |
0.02 | −0.63 [−1.12 – −0.23] |
| Education | Primary Vocational Secondary Higher |
29.5 ± 10.5 27.5 ± 7.4 26.8 ± 10.1 31.8 ± 10.2 |
0.266 | 0.041 [0–0.12] |
| Work type before stroke | Physical Mental |
27.5 ± 8.8 29.7 ±10.3 |
0.248 | −0.23 [−0.68–0.17] |
| Marital status | Singlea Marriedb Widow/widowerc |
18.1 ± 7.3 32.4 ± 7.2 27.0 ± 9.5 |
a vs b <0.001 a vs c 0.0011 b vs c 0.015 |
0.325 [0.18–0.45] |
| Family care capacity | Lacka Incompleteb Fullc |
19.3 ± 7.3 27.5 ± 9.3 33.3 ± 7.0 |
a vs b <0.001 a vs c <0.001 b vs c 0.005 |
0.323 [0.17–0.45] |
Notes: Tests: Student’s t-test (with two groups) or ANOVA (for more than two groups) with Tukey HSD post hoc analysis, Effect size – *Hedges’ g (for two groups), Ges: generalized eta squared (for more than two groups).