Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 26;10:536842. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.536842

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival in 437 esophageal carcinoma patients.

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95%CI P-value HR 95%CI P-value
Age (<64 vs. ≥64 years) 0.817 0.611–1.092 0.171 0.782 1.581–1.051 0.103
Gender (Male vs. Female) 0.944 0.696–1.280 0.712 0.756 0.502–1.137 0.179
Smoking (Yes vs. No) (3 missing data) 1.190 0.893–1.586 0.235 1.181 0.710–1.967 0.522
Alcohol (Yes vs. No) (5 missing data) 1.151 0.863–1.535 0.338 1.227 0.768–1.960 0.391
Medical insurance (Rural vs. Others) 1.110 0.822–1.498 0.495
Blood loss (≤ 200 vs. >200 ml) 0.840 0.565–1.294 0.390
Operation time (≤ 180 vs. >180 min) 0.821 0.580–1.162 0.265
Lymph nodes retrieved (≤ 23 vs. >23) 1.112 0.834–1.484 0.469
pT stage (T1–2 vs. T3–4) 2.059 1.431–2.963 0.0001
pN stage (N0 vs. N1–3) 2.570 1.917–3.446 <0.0001*
pTNM staging 7th (I, II vs. III) 6.438 0.327–0.587 <0.0001* 0.431 0.321–0.579 <0.001*
Surgical approach (R vs. L) 1.002 0.752–1.337 0.987 1.031 0.771–1.377 0.838

HR, Hazard Ratio; CI, confidence interval; pN, pathological lymph nodes; pTNM, pathological tumor/node/metastasis; R, minimally invasive esophagectomy; L, open esophagectomy.

*

Statistically significant (p < 0.05).