Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 30;29(5):786–799. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1206

Table 3.

Chi‐square tests of differences between sociodemographic and clinical variables per survey item

Do you wish to be informed about genetic risks? General population sample Patient sample
Treatable condition Untreatable condition In both treatable and untreatable conditions
Preferred to be informed N (%) p Effect size (V)d N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V)
Gender
Males 495 (96.7) .008a Weak 423 (86.0) .560 Weak NA    
Females 464 (99.1)     377 (87.5)          
Education level
Low 293 (30.6) .031 Weak 249 (31.1) .142 Weak NA    
Moderate 389 (40.6)     333 (41.6)          
High 277 (28.9)     218 (27.3)          
Parenthoode
Yes 596 (97.4) .257 Weak 504 (87.3) .423 Weak NA    
No 353 (98.6)     289 (85.5)          
Religion
Yes 340 (96.9) .114 Weak 283 (84.2) .107 Weak NA    
No 619 (98.4)     517 (88.1)          
Which relatives should be informed? In both treatable and untreatable conditions In both treatable and untreatable conditions
At first first‐degree relatives, subsequently further‐degree relatives N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V)
Gender
Males 254 (48.7) .001a Weak 36 (49.3) .045 Weak
Females 277 (57.9)     144 (54.8)    
Education level
Low 137 (44.1) <.001a Weak 12 (54.5) .721 Weak
Moderate 200 (50.3)     89 (53.6)    
High 194 (66.7)     79 (53.4)    
Parenthoode
Yes 317 (51.1) .378 Weak 124 (51.0) .003c Moderate
No 206 (55.7)     56 (60.2)    
Religion
Yes 189 (52.6) .121 Weak 62 (54.4) .151 Weak
No 342 (53.4)     118 (53.2)    
Patient type
Affected NA     121 (53.5) .196 Weak
Carrier       32 (50.0)    
Non‐carrier       27 (58.7)    
Who should inform at‐risk relatives? Treatable condition Untreatable condition In both treatable and untreatable conditions
By proband and/or HCP N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V)
Gender
Males 263 (52.1) <.001a Weak 247 (48.1) <.001b Weak 34 (48.6) .244 Weak
Females 286 (47.9)     266 (57.5)     119 (47.0)    
Education level
Low 172 (55.3) .001a Weak 166 (56.3) .001b Weak 10 (45.5) .525 Weak
Moderate 228 (57.3)     216 (56.1)     67 (42.4)    
High 149 (51.2)     131 (46.3)     76 (53.1)    
Parenthoode
Yes 347 (56.3) .545 Weak 314 (53.0) .929 Weak 98 (42.1) .014 Weak
No 200 (54.3)     196 (54.3)     55 (61.1)    
Religion
Yes 187 (52.2) .096 Weak 172 (50.1) .008b Weak 46 (41.4) .165 Weak
No 362 (56.9)     341 (55.0)     107 (50.5)    
Patient type
Affected NA     NA     94 (43.4) .280 Weak
Carrier             36 (58.1)    
Non‐carrier             23 (52.3)    
How should ethical issues be handled? Treatable condition Untreatable condition In both treatable and untreatable conditions
Contact details of relatives may be looked up by HCPs in registers N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V)
Gender
Males 263 (51.1) .547 Weak 237 (46.1) .008b Weak 29 (42.6) .487 Weak
Females 248 (53.0)     259 (55.5)     116 (46.0)    
Education level
Low 178 (58.0) .110 Weak 158 (51.5) .002b Weak 8 (38.1) .881 Weak
Moderate 199 (51.0)     198 (50.5)     76 (48.1)    
High 134 (46.9)     140 (49.6)     61 (43.3)    
Parenthoode
Yes 332 (54.5) .003a Weak 301 (49.5) .002b Weak 102 (44.0) .427 Weak
No 176 (48.2)     190 (52.3)     43 (48.9)    
Religion
Yes 204 (58.1) .013 Weak 184 (52.4) .561 Weak 47 (43.5) .864 Weak
No 307 (48.6)     312 (49.5)     98 (46.2)    
Patient type
Affected NA     NA     95 (44.6) .052 Weak
Carrier             26 (41.3)    
Non‐carrier             24 (54.5)    
  In both treatable and untreatable conditions In both treatable and untreatable conditions
Children of relatives who decide against predictive DNA testing should be informed N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V)
Gender
Males 335 (67.4) .002a Weak 34 (47.9) .048 Weak
Females 296 (64.8)     161 (61.7)    
Education level
Low 218 (72.7) .006a Weak 15 (68.2) .094 Weak
Moderate 253 (66.4)     99 (60.7)    
High 160 (58.6)     81 (55.1)    
Parenthoode
Yes 386 (65.6) .790 Weak 148 (61.9) .137 Weak
No 241 (67.6)     47 (50.5)    
Religion
Yes 227 (66.4) .953 Weak 63 (55.8) .697 Weak
No 404 (66.0)     132 (60.3)    
Patient type
Affected NA     133 (59.6) .136 Weak
Carrier       35 (54.7)    
Non‐carrier       27 (60.0)    
  Treatable condition Untreatable condition In both treatable and untreatable conditions
Relatives should be directly informed when proband does not inform them N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V) N (%) p Effect size (V)
Gender
Males 301 (57.7) <.001a Weak 328 (62.8) .023 0.087 25 (36.2) .065 Weak
Females 306 (64.0)     325 (68.0)     112 (44.1)    
Education level
Low 176 (56.6) .021 Weak 211 (678) .386 0.046 7 (31.8) .520 Weak
Moderate 257 (64.6)     265 (66.6)     69 (43.7)    
High 174 (59.8)     177 (60.8)     61 (42.7)    
Parenthoode
Yes 365 (58.9) .174 Weak 404 (65.2) .967 0.008 102 (43.6) .298 Weak
No 236 (63.8)     243 (65.7)     35 (39.3)    
Religion
Yes 198 (55.2) .011 Weak 219 (61.0) .073 0.072 40 (36.4) .089 Weak
No 409 (63.8)     434 (67.7)     97 (45.5)    
Patient type
Affected NA     NA     77 (35.8) .005c Weak
Carrier             37 (58.7)    
Non‐carrier             23 (51.1)    

NA, not applicable, survey item not included in the survey, or comparison of treatable and untreatable conditions; N (%): percentage within category

a

Considered significant based on the Bonferroni‐adjusted p‐level of p < .010 (0.05/5)

b

considered significant based on the Bonferroni‐adjusted p‐level of p < .013 (0.05/4)

c

considered significant based on the Bonferroni‐adjusted p‐level of p < .008 (0.05/6). Open answer categories were not included in the chi‐square analysis due to the small numbers resulting in the chi‐square analyses being not appropriate.

d

Effect size using Cramer's V: weak effect size = Cramer's V < 0.20; moderate effect size = Cramer's V = 0.20–0.30; strong effect size = Cramer's V > 0.30

e

Due to missing values regarding parenthood (unknown: N = 10) in the general population sample, the total numbers differ from Table 2.