Table 11.

The comparison on the quantitative results of various lung nodule malignancy suspiciousness classification methods. Please note that “TML” indicates the traditional machine learning

Type	Method	SEN	SPC	ACC	AUC
TML	Lee et al. [20]	0.870	0.840	0.810	0.889
	Kaya et al. [23]	0.559	0.947	0.825	*
	Dhara et al. [27]	*	*	*	0.946
	Wei et al. [30]	*	*	0.854	*
CNN	Liu et al. [37]	0.664	0.853	0.779	0.852
	Sun et al. [39]	0.692	0.880	0.806	0.867
	Causey et al. [36]	*	*	0.750	0.860
	Lee et al. [38]	0.716	0.894	0.838	0.889
	Liu et al. [40]	*	*	0.882	0.934
	Shen et al. [47]	0.770	0.930	0.871	0.930
	Ours	0.837	0.939	0.906	0.939