Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 23;33(5):1144–1154. doi: 10.1007/s10278-020-00355-9

Table 2.

Comparison among different CAD schemes for lung nodule detection

FP/s 1/8 1/4 1/2 1 2 4 8 CPM
3D U-Net + DPN26 [9] 0.603 0.729 0.831 0.885 0.930 0.952 0.968 0.843
3D U-Net + multi-scale [11] 0.733 0.823 0.881 0.918 0.950 0.960 0.970 0.891
3D U-Net + multi-RF 0.712 0.849 0.909 0.922 0.947 0.952 0.976 0.896

Italic entries represent the best results for the performance metrics.