Table 3.
Detailed Evaluation Regarding Main Features of Both MTX-Autoinjectors After Cross-Testing
| Surveyed MTX-Autoinjector | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | Score | A (n=65) | B (n=35) |
| Relative satisfaction | 1 | 9% | 51% |
| 2 | 14% | 20% | |
| 3 | 77% | 29% | |
| Easy to use (injection) | 1 | 9% | 46% |
| 2 | 16% | 31% | |
| 3 | 75% | 23% | |
| Easy to uncap | 1 | 10% | 6% |
| 2 | 45% | 63% | |
| 3 | 45% | 31% | |
| Easy to grip | 1 | 11% | 15% |
| 2 | 30% | 42% | |
| 3 | 59% | 43% | |
| Injection mode (± push button) | 1 | 9% | 51% |
| 2 | 11% | 17% | |
| 3 | 80% | 31% | |
| Convenient (size, format) | 1 | 3% | 46% |
| 2 | 33% | 29% | |
| 3 | 64% | 26% | |
| Design (size, ergonomics) | 1 | 12% | 54% |
| 2 | 16% | 26% | |
| 3 | 72% | 20% | |
| Adapted to the administration of the treatment | 1 | 3% | 23% |
| 2 | 44% | 54% | |
| 3 | 53% | 23% | |
| Means of identification of different dosages | 1 | 2% | 14% |
| 2 | 47% | 71% | |
| 3 | 51% | 14% | |
| End-of-injection recognition system | 1 | 6% | 60% |
| 2 | 31% | 31% | |
| 3 | 63% | 9% | |
Notes: Figures are rounded at the nearest unit. Surveyed MTX-autoinjector: A (n=65), the 65 RA patients who currently used MTX-autoinjector B evaluated MTX-autoinjector A (unfamiliar MTX-autoinjector); B (n=35), the 35 RA patients who currently used MTX-autoinjector A evaluated MTX-autoinjector B (unfamiliar MTX-autoinjector). 1 = Worse than the familiar MTX-autoinjector; 2 = Similar to the familiar MTX-autoinjector; 3 = Better than the familiar MTX-autoinjector.
Abbreviation: MTX, methotrexate.