Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):1378. doi: 10.3390/foods9101378

Table 1.

Method validation (linearity, recovery, and precision of method).

Method linearity
Slope a 11.348 ± 0.026
Intercept a 13.514 ± 3.908
Correlation coefficient (r) 0.999 ± 0.000
LOD [mg/kg] 3.6
LOQ [mg/kg] 11.8
Method recovery b
Reference material Reference value [mg/kg] Determined value [mg/kg] Recovery [%] RSD [%]
muva-BU-1312 2337 ± 196 2395.6 ± 72.6 102.5 ± 0.0 3.0
muva-BU-1311 2334 ± 211 2381.6 ± 66.6 102.0 ± 0.0 2.8
muva-BU-1314 2276 ± 135 2307.7 ± 58.9 101.4 ± 0.0 2.6
The amount of cholesterol standard spiked to the butter sample [mg/L] Determined value [mg/kg] Recovery [%] RSD [%]
0 2367.0 ± 29.9 - -
500 2460.6 ± 39.0 103.9 ± 0.0 1.6
1000 2475.4 ± 31.5 104.6 ± 0.0 1.3
1500 2515.9 ± 52.7 106.3 ± 0.0 2.1
Method precision c
Reference material Repeatability RSD [%] Intermediate precision [RSD%] Horrat
muva-BU-1312 Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
2.5
2.6
2.2
1.8 0.01
muva-BU-1311 Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
3.9
2.3
0.6
0.9 0.01
muva-BU-1314 Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
1.4
3.5
1.9
0.8 0.01

The values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, a n = 4, b n = 12, c n = 4; muva-BU-1312, sweet cream butter; muva-BU-1311, butter mild soured; muva-BU-1314, sweet cream butter salted; LOD, limit of detection; LOQ, limit of quantification; RSD, relative standard deviation.