Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 19;24(3):537–543. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw157

Table 2.

Descriptive results by stakeholder type

Study variables Total (N = 292) Patients/caregivers (N = 133) Professionals (N = 159) P-value
M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Willingness to use OMD again 5.31 (1.31) 5.73 (1.13) 4.95 (1.34) <.001
Active participant engagement (yes) 0.51 (0.50) 0.58 (0.50) 0.46 (0.50) .04
 Answered at least 90% of rating questions in Rounds One and Three 0.77 (0.42) 0.76 (0.43) 0.77 (0.42) .78
 Explained at least 90% of ratings in Round One or Three 0.60 (0.49) 0.66 (0.58) 0.55 (0.48) .06
 Posted at least2 comments in Round Two discussions 0.90 (0.30) 0.90 (0.30) 0.89 (0.31) .80
OMD system’s ease of use 5.39 (1.44) 5.58 (1.39) 5.21 (1.47) .04
Experience with the online process (1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree)
Study Participation Experience Index 4.33 (1.13) 4.67 (1.08) 4.03 (1.10) <.001
 This study was too longa 3.88 (1.60) 3.43 (1.44) 4.28 (1.63) <.001
 Participation in this study was frustratinga 3.04 (1.58) 2.65 (1.49) 3.39 (1.58 <.001
 Participation in this study took a lot of efforta 4.23 (1.72) 4.06 (1.80) 4.37 (1.63) .16
 The right set of questions was asked in this study 4.46 (1.49) 4.83 (1.46) 4.14 (1.43) <.001
Online Discussion Experience Index 4.92 (0.67) 5.06 (0.63) 4.79 (0.68) <.001
 The discussions gave me a better understanding of the issues 5.37 (1.26) 5.63 (1.17) 5.14 (1.30) .002
 I had trouble following the discussiona 3.76 (1.74) 3.24 (1.60) 4.21 (1.72) <.001
 Participants debated each other’s viewpoints during the discussions 4.94 (1.15) 5.07 (1.11) 4.83 (1.17) .11
 The discussions brought out views I had not considered 5.25 (1.32) 5.46 (1.36) 5.06 (1.27) .02
 The discussions brought out divergent views 5.31 (1.08) 5.27 (1.15) 5.34 (1.03) .62
 Participants sometimes misinterpreted each other’s comments during the discussion 4.40 (1.35) 4.34 (1.33) 4.46 (1.37) .47
 The discussion round caused me to revise my original answers 4.80 (0.88) 4.83 (1.40) 4.77 (1.38) .73
 I was comfortable expressing my views in the discussion round 5.91 (0.88) 5.94 (0.94) 5.89 (0.82) .63

Note: aThese items were reverse-coded before being included in an index so that 7 corresponded to the most favorable rating and 1 to the least favorable.