Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):4925–4928. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_742_20

Table 5.

Correlation between measured size of stones using ultrasonography and computed tomography

Diameter on US Diameter on CT
Spearman’s rho
 Diameter on US
  Correlation coefficient 1.000 0.755**
  Significant (one-tailed) . 0.000
  Number (n) 100 100
 Diameter on CT
  Correlation coefficient 0.755** 1.000
  Significant (one-tailed) 0.000 .
  Number (n) 100 100

**Spearman’s correlation coefficient revealed strong compatibility between US measurements and CT measurements (r=0.755), (P=0<0.001). US: Ultrasonography, CT: Computed tomography