Table 5.
Correlation between measured size of stones using ultrasonography and computed tomography
Diameter on US | Diameter on CT | |
---|---|---|
Spearman’s rho | ||
Diameter on US | ||
Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.755** |
Significant (one-tailed) | . | 0.000 |
Number (n) | 100 | 100 |
Diameter on CT | ||
Correlation coefficient | 0.755** | 1.000 |
Significant (one-tailed) | 0.000 | . |
Number (n) | 100 | 100 |
**Spearman’s correlation coefficient revealed strong compatibility between US measurements and CT measurements (r=0.755), (P=0<0.001). US: Ultrasonography, CT: Computed tomography