Table 6. Logistic regression estimates representing the influence of SES on the before discharging postnatal care.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variables | OR [95% CI] (n = 3,515) | P- value | OR [95% CI] (n = 3,515) | P- value | OR [95% CI] (n = 3,515) | P-value |
Intercept | 1.08[0.59,1.96] | 0.803 | 0.93[0.50,1.75] | 0.825 | 0.85[0.45,1.62] | 0.627 |
Residence | 0.40[0.32,0.49] | 0.000 | 0.60[0.39,0.93] | 0.021 | 0.66[0.42,1.03] | 0.067 |
Head of household’s sex | 1.04[0.85,1.28] | 0.680 | 1.03[0.86,1.27] | 0.739 | 1.03[0.84,1.26] | 0.763 |
Age | 1.02[1.01,1.04] | 0.010 | 1.02[1.01,1.04] | 0.010 | 1.02[1.00,1.04] | 0.009 |
Informal employed | 0.94[0.67,1.32] | 0.730 | 0.94[0.67,1.32] | 0.721 | 0.95[0.68,1.33] | 0.773 |
Not employed | 0.85[0.58,1.26] | 0.427 | 0.85[0.57,1.25] | 0.404 | 0.84[0.57,1.24] | 0.384 |
Formal employed | ||||||
Number of children | 0.53[0.41,0.68] | 0.000 | 0.53[0.41,0.69] | 0.000 | 0.53[0.41,0.69] | 0.000 |
No education | 0.53[0.37,0.76] | 0.001 | 0.65[0.34,1.26] | 0.202 | 0.60[0.32,1.13] | 0.113 |
Primary school | 0.72[0.56,0.93] | 0.011 | 0.89[0.66,1.19] | 0.428 | 0.84[0.63,1.11] | 0.223 |
Secondary school + | ||||||
Poor women | 0.62[0.50,0.78] | 0.000 | 0.62[0.49,0.78] | 0.000 | 0.71[0.49,1.03] | 0.072 |
Middle wealth women | 0.63[0.50,0.79] | 0.000 | 0.63[0.50,0.80] | 0.000 | 0.80[0.57,1.12] | 0.190 |
Rich women | ||||||
Rural*no education | 0.61[0.27,1.35] | 0.219 | 0.70[0.32,1.52] | 0.363 | ||
Rural*primary school | 0.60[0.38,0.95] | 0.030 | 0.66[0.41,1.06] | 0.088 | ||
Rural*secondary school+ | ||||||
Rural*poor women | 0.81[0.51,1.28] | 0.361 | ||||
Rural*middle wealth | 0.65[0.40,1.06] | 0.084 | ||||
Rural*rich women |