Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 24;46:100875. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100875

Table 3.

Pairwise comparisons of mean volumetric outputs for different TPMs in cohort 2. Paired t-tests were used to compare tissue volume estimates between pairs of pipelines. TPM = tissue probability map. TOM = Template-O-Matic, COM = CerebroMatic.

Measure: TIV
TPM 1 (cm3) TPM 2 (cm3) Mean Difference t(73) P-value 95 % Confidence Interval for Difference
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Default (1387.94) TOM (1413.97) −26.03 −9.68 <.001 −20.67 −31.38
Default (1387.94) COM (1415.72) −27.78 −11.18 <.001 −22.82 −32.73
TOM (1413.97) COM (1415.72) −1.75 −0.59 = .55 −4.12 7.62
Measure: GM Volume
TPM 1 (cm3) TPM 2 (cm3) Mean Difference t(73) P-value 95 % Confidence Interval for Difference
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Default (756.25) TOM (762.86) −6.61 −2.49 0.014 −1.32 −11.88
Default (756.25) COM (773.49) −17.24 −10.17 <.001 −13.86 −20.62
TOM (762.86) COM (773.49) −10.64 −5.09 <.001 −6.47 −14.81
Measure: WM Volume
TPM 1 (cm3) TPM 2 (cm3) Mean Difference t(73) P-value 95 % Confidence Interval for Difference
Lower Bound Upper Bound
Default (418.64) TOM (425.71) −7.06 −10.1 <.001 −8.46 −5.67
Default (418.64) COM (419.04) −0.39 −0.59 0.56 −1.71 0.93
TOM (425.71) COM (419.04) 6.67 12.03 <.001 5.57 7.78