Table 1.
Results of urinalysis as measured by the iRICELL3000.
| Organism | No. of samples (missing value*) | WBCs median count/ul (range) | Non-negative rate (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBCs | Leucocyte esterase | Nitrite | Bacterial | WBCC | Epithelial cells | |||
| Escherichia | 589 (14) | 185 (51–797) | 492 (85.57%) | 509 (88.52%) | 370 (64.35%) | 153 (26.61%) | 286 (49.74%) | 340 (59.13%) |
| Enterococcus | 186 (9) | 106 (16–470) | 131 (74.01%) | 129 (72.88%) | 22 (12.43%) | 28 (15.82%) | 75 (42.37%) | 48 (27.12%) |
| Fungi | 112 (4) | 464 (101–1880) | 100 (92.59%) | 94 (87.04%) | 5 (4.63%) | 8 (7.41%) | 50 (46.30%) | 28 (25.93%) |
| Klebsiella | 121 (6) | 370 (65–1806) | 100 (86.96%) | 101 (87.83%) | 56 (48.70%) | 25 (21.74%) | 66 (57.39%) | 30 (26.09%) |
| Streptococcus | 134 (7) | 68 (10–264) | 86 (67.72%) | 94 (74.02%) | 7 (5.51%) | 8 (6.30%) | 37 (29.13%) | 67 (52.76%) |
| Proteus | 90 (9) | 106 (12.5–596.5) | 59 (72.84%) | 63 (77.78%) | 32 (39.51%) | 5 (6.17%) | 28 (34.57%) | 27 (33.33%) |
| Pseudomonas | 28 (2) | 754.5 (180.75–1535.5) | 25 (96.15%) | 24 (92.31%) | 15 (57.69%) | 3 (11.54%) | 20 (76.92%) | 7 (26.92%) |
| Staphylococcus | 55 (2) | 69 (9.5–213) | 39 (73.58%) | 36 (67.92%) | 12 (22.64%) | 3 (5.66%) | 16 (30.19%) | 15 (28.30%) |
| Enterobacter | 28 (2) | 123.5 (21–693.5) | 19 (73.08%) | 24 (92.31%) | 13 (50.00%) | 2 (7.69%) | 14 (53.85%) | 7 (26.92%) |
| Acinetobacter | 20 (1) | 30 (6–261) | 10 (52.63%) | 12 (63.16%) | 3 (15.79%) | 0 (0.00%) | 8 (42.11%) | 4 (21.05%) |
| Other bacterial | 64 (3) | 72.5 (13–390.25) | 42 (68.85%) | 43 (70.49%) | 20 (32.79%) | 5 (8.20%) | 23 (37.70%) | 17 (27.87%) |
| Negative control | 475 (4) | 27 (6–124) | 282 (59.87%) | 256 (54.35%) | 20 (4.25%) | 23 (4.88%) | 108 (22.93%) | 118 (25.05%) |
| Normal control | 459 (0) | 4 (2–8) | 23 (5.01%) | 110 (23.97%)** | 1 (0.22%) | 3 (0.65%) | 1 (0.22%) | 126 (27.45%)** |
*Missing value: The number of samples without urinalysis results.
**The number of leukocyte esterase and epithelial cell abnormalities in male urine was only 13 and 14 cases, respectively, while the female may have a high abnormal rate due to the influence of reproductive tract inflammation.