Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;7:580356. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.580356

Table 2.

Proportions of the different sinus compartments that were affected in 100 horses with sinus disease at each of three different centers.

Compartment affected Combined N = 300 Dental sinusitis N = 160 Non-dental sinusitis N = 140 X2 Dental vs. Non-Dental
RMS 284 (94.7%) 157 (98.2%) 127 (90.7%) X2 (1) = 6.72 P = 0.009
VCS 261 (87%) 140 (87.5%) 121 (86.4%) X2 (1) = 0.01 P = 0.918
CMS 196 (65.3%) 96 (60%) 100 (71.4%) X2 (1) = 3.82 P = 0.051
DCS 158 (52.7%) 75 (46.9%) 83 (59.3%) X2 (1) = 4.13 P = 0.042
FS 78 (26%) 35 (21.9%) 43 (30.7%) X2 (1) = 2.59 P = 0.108
ES 96 (32%) 44 (27.5%) 52 (37.1%) X2 (1) = 2.76 P = 0.096
SPS 86 (28.7%) 29 (18.1%) 57 (40.7%) X2 (1) = 17.54 P < 0.001

X2, Chi-square test with “Yates continuity correction,” significant P-values in bold; RMS, rostral maxillary sinus; VCS, ventral conchal sinus; CMS caudal maxillary sinus; DCS, dorsal conchal sinus; FS, frontal sinus; ES, ethmoidal sinus (also termed the middle conchal sinus); SPS, sphenopalatine sinus.