Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;7:101113. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101113

Table 5.

Comparison of RNA yields for adipose tissue RNA extraction protocols by different research groups.

Type of tissue Site Method used RNA yield (in μg/mg) 260/280 ratio 260/230 ratio Authors
Human adipose tissue Subcutaneous and omental TRIzol- 1.5 mL for 100 mg 0.06 1.70 Engeli et al. 1999 [18]
Primary human adipocytes Mammary adipose tissue TRIzol- 1.5 mL for 1 g or 2 × 105 cells 0.02 1.58 Janke et al. 2001 [3]
Porcine adipose tissue Retroperitoneal TRI Reagent and miRNeasy (combined) 0.044 2.00 1.73 Cirera 2013 [7]
Human adipose tissue Subcutaneous: abdominal or mammary RNeasy Lipid Tissue Kit 0.133 Hemmrich et al. 2010 [4]
Human adipose tissue Subcutaneous, perivascular, and epicardial TRIzol and RNeasy kit 2.09 1.95 Sinitsky et al. 2018 [6]
Human adipose tissue Subcutaneous adipose tissue MagNA Pure Compact RNA Isolation kit 0.034 1.74 Lacinova et al. 2008 [9]
Animal adipose tissue Subcutaneous adipose tissue SDS, mercapto-ethanol and guanidium chloride extraction buffer 0.011–0.052 Sharma et al. 2017 [10]
Porcine tissues Liver, muscle, hypophysis, adipose tissue, intestinal mucosa TRIzol- 1 mL per 100 mg tissue powder 0.50 1.8–2.0 Mendez et al. 2011 [11]
Rat adipose tissue Epididymal and perirenal Guanidium thiocyanate extraction buffer- 1 mL per 1.5 g tissue 0.07 2.0–2.2 Tavangar et al. 1990 [13]
Human adipose tissue Abdominal visceral TRIzol- 250μL per 500 mg of tissue 0.042 1.98 1.84 Current study

Total RNA yields are normalized to μg/mg for each study, wherever data was available.

In case multiple methods were employed, the method with the best overall outcomes have been mentioned.