Table 3.
Comparisons Between Male and Female Type-Specific Rates | Nyitray et al, 2014 [9]c | Mbulawa et al, 2012 [18]c | Liu et al, 2015 [16]d |
---|---|---|---|
Genotypes not tested | 16 | 16 | 6 |
Genotypes with equal rates | 9 | 1 | 26 |
Genotypes with M–F > F–M transmission ratesa | 11 | 6 | 14 |
Genotypes with F–M > M–F transmission ratesa | 16 | 29 | 6 |
Total No. genotypes | 52 | 52 | 52 |
Abbreviations: F–M, female-to-male; HPV, human papillomavirus; M–F, male-to-female.
aPreponderance was defined as the counts of type-specific rates favoring 1 directionality.
bRefer to Supplementary Table 3 for type-specific rates used to determine the overall counts.
cIncidence rates in males and females were used to infer directionality under the assumption that HPV transmission occurred between study partners. For example, a higher female HPV incidence rate would infer higher M-to-F transmission and vice-versa.
dTransmission rates were used.