Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 27;7:519601. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.519601

Table 4.

Geometric mean, 95% confidence intervals, and Benjamini–Hochberg–adjusted Wilcoxon p-values for pairwise comparisons of prevalence of foot lesions in ewes by latent class for treatment of lambs (823 flocks) and treatment of ewes (908 flocks).

Treatment of lambs latent class model Treatment of ewes latent class model
Latent class GM prevalence of foot lesions in ewes BH-adjusted p GM prevalence of foot lesions in ewes BH-adjusted p
LC2 LC3 LC4 LC2 LC3 LC4
Interdigital dermatitis
LC1 1.09 (0.54–2.18)a 0.18 0.03 0.18 1.06 (0.48–2.34)a 0.03 0.22 0.01
LC2 2.65 (1.82–3.85)ab 0.31 0.78 4.01 (3.02–5.32)bc 0.18 0.79
LC3 3.92 (3.06–5.02)b 0.20 1.84 (1.18–2.87)ab 0.04
LC4 3.52 (2.77–4.47)ab 3.54 (2.93–4.27)c
Severe footrot
LC1 0.47 (0.21–1.03)a 0.49 0.49 0.64 0.51 (0.21–1.24)a 0.28 0.04 0.09
LC2 1.09 (0.68–1.73)a 0.82 0.64 0.98 (0.56–1.72)ab 0.09 0.34
LC3 1.19 (0.80–1.79)a 0.68 1.15 (0.71–1.89)b 0.18
LC4 0.89 (0.56–1.42)a 0.95 (0.69–1.30)ab
Contagious ovine digital dermatitis
LC1 0.01 (0.00–0.03)a 0.10 0.04 0.32 0.02 (0.01–0.07)ab 0.61 0.17 0.12
LC2 0.05 (0.02–0.09)ab 0.32 0.32 0.01 (0.00–0.02)b 0.04 0.02
LC3 0.06 (0.03–0.11)b 0.10 0.04 (0.02–0.08)a 0.94
LC4 0.03 (0.01–0.05)ab 0.04 (0.03–0.06)a
Shelly hoof
LC1 0.03 (0.01–0.10)a 0.30 0.18 0.30 0.06 (0.02–0.18)a 0.70 0.26 0.26
LC2 0.11 (0.05–0.22)a 0.30 0.81 0.05 (0.02–0.14)a 0.26 0.35
LC3 0.13 (0.07–0.27)a 0.33 0.11 (0.05–0.27)a 0.60
LC4 0.10 (0.05–0.21)a 0.08 (0.05–0.14)a

GM, geometric mean; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval (lower, upper); BH, Benjamini–Hochberg. Where superscripts (a, b, c) differ across rows, prevalence of lesion or lameness differs (BH-adjusted Wilcoxon p ≤ 0.05) between latent classes.