Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;124(11):1219–1228. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520002317

Table 2.

Meal, snack and total eating frequency and diet quality scores according to each category of basic characteristics in 639 Japanese adults aged 20–81 years

(Mean values and standard deviations)

n Meal frequency (times/d) Snack frequency (times/d) Total eating frequency (times/d) HEI-2015§ NRF9.3
Participant identified* Time of day Participant identified* Time of day
Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd Mean sd
Sex
  Male 318 2·90 0·24 3·51 0·95 1·62 1·31 1·02 0·79 4·52 1·34 51·7 7·3 678 104
  Female 321 2·94 0·15 3·61 0·86 1·89 1·23 1·21 0·79 4·83 1·26 52·5 7·4 657 107
  P 0·04 0·13 0·007 0·002 0·003 0·21 0·01
Age group (years)
  <40 205 2·86a 0·28 3·43a 0·94 1·71 1·35 1·14 0·84 4·57 1·43 48·2a 6·5 615a 114
  40–59 279 2·94b 0·16 3·70b 0·90 1·85 1·23 1·09 0·77 4·78 1·23 52·5b 6·6 675b 92
  ≥60 155 2·97b 0·11 3·49a,b 0·84 1·65 1·26 1·13 0·79 4·62 1·27 56·6c 6·9 723c 84
  P ** <0·0001 0·003 0·24 0·77 0·17 <0·0001 <0·0001
Weight status††
  Underweight 35 2·94 0·15 3·71 1·04 2·05 1·42 1·28 0·78 4·99 1·45 50·5 6·2 633 117
  Normal weight 445 2·92 0·20 3·58 0·91 1·77 1·24 1·11 0·77 4·69 1·27 52·1 7·2 671 101
  Overweight 159 2·91 0·23 3·47 0·86 1·65 1·34 1·09 0·89 4·57 1·38 52·5 7·9 664 116
  P ** 0·82 0·27 0·23 0·45 0·21 0·33 0·10
Dietary reporting status‡‡
  Underreporting 20 2·43a 0·51 2·90a 1·26 1·30 1·34 0·83a 0·64 3·73a 1·49 46·8a 9·4 605a 150
  Plausible reporting 604 2·94b 0·16 3·57b 0·88 1·77 1·27 1·14a 0·80 4·71b 1·29 52·2b 7·2 671b 102
  Overreporting 15 3·00b 0·00 3·95b 1·09 1·67 1·50 0·72a 0·67 4·67a,b 1·50 54·9b 7·9 615a,b 159
  P ** <0·0001 0·001 0·25 0·03 0·004 0·002 0·004
Survey year
  2003 250 2·96 0·14 3·61 0·80 1·72 1·11 1·07 0·68 4·69 1·13 53·6 6·9 689 96
  2013 389 2·89 0·23 3·53 0·97 1·78 1·37 1·14 0·87 4·67 1·41 51·2 7·5 653 110
  P <0·0001 0·23 0·62 0·27 0·89 <0·0001 <0·0001

HEI-2015, Healthy Eating Index-2015; NRF9.3, Nutrient-Rich Food Index 9.3.

*

For the participant-identified definition, eating occasions recorded in the sections of breakfast, lunch and dinner in the food diary were considered meals, while eating occasions recorded in the snack section were considered snacks. For multiple entries of eating occasions into a section of breakfast, lunch or dinner (ten cases), however, the first eating occasion was considered a meal, and the following eating occasions were considered snacks.

For the time-of-day definition, meals were defined as eating occasions whose start time was within select time periods of the day (06.00–10.00, 12.00–15.00 and 18.00–21.00 hours), and any eating occasions starting outside of these time periods were considered snacks.

Sum of meal frequency and snack frequency.

§

A maximum score is 100. A higher score indicates a higher diet quality.

A maximum score is 900. A higher score indicates a higher diet quality.

Based on independent t test.

**

Based on ANOVA. When the overall P from ANOVA was <0·05, Bonferroni’s post hoc test was performed; values within each variable with unlike superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0·05).

††

Underweight, normal weight and overweight were defined as participants having a BMI (in kg/m2) of <18·5, ≥18·5 to <25 and ≥25, respectively.

‡‡

Underreporting, plausible reporting and overreporting were defined as participants having a ratio of reported energy intake to BMR of <1·02, ≥1·02 to <2·35 and ≥2·35, respectively.