. 2020 Nov 10;44(4):653–660. doi: 10.1007/s00449-020-02474-7

Table 2.

Effect of cell density on biomass and stilbenes accumulation

Biomass¹			GI²	Stilbenes accumulations³
IFW	FFW	FDW	GI²	MuA	OXY	RES
0.5	0.70 ± 0.10^a	0.04 ± 0.02^a	0.28 ± 0.10^a	11.1 ± 2.30^a	83.8 ± 6.04^a	13.4 ± 3.59^a
1	2.60 ± 0.28^b	0.2 ± 0.13^a	0.61 ± 0.04^b	10.2 ± 0.48^{a, c}	98.0 ± 5.16^a	32.5 ± 3.54^b
2	4.46 ± 0.28^c	0.38 ± 0.02^b	0.55 ± 0.03^b	13.3 ± 1.88^a	133 ± 7.90^b	38.4 ± 1.51^b
3	4.33 ± 0.23^c	0.41 ± 0.02^b	0.31 ± 0.04^a	18.7 ± 1.00^b	136 ± 5.05^b	41.6 ± 5.84^b
6	8.66 ± 0.58^d	0.79 ± 0.01^c	0.31 ± 0.05^a	6.65 ± 0.62^c	88.6 ± 10.5^a	14.0 ± 0.63^a

¹The biomasses of MA roots were demonstrated with initial fresh weight (IFW), final fresh weight (FFW), and final DW (FDW), which all are in the unit of g/flask

²Growth index (GI) is calculated regarding the initial fresh weight (IFW) and final fresh weight (FFW)

³The contents of MuA are expressed in the unit of mg/g DW, whereas OXY and RES are in the unit of µg/g DW. The data were presented with the form of mean ± SD. The same and different characters indicate the non-significant and significant difference, respectively, when data are compared between them in each column. Statistical significance is determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD (p < 0.05)