Table 2.

Association between the proportion of organic food in the diet and risk of T2D, NutriNet-Santé study, 2014–2019, N = 33,256^*

model	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Q5	P for trend1	5 points increment	P2
Total organic food
Person-years	26,709	27,128	27,218	27,120	26,816
Number of cases	83	72	51	48	39
Model 13	1.00 (ref)	0.94 (0.69, 1.30)	0.69 (0.48, 0.98)	0.70 (0.48, 1.00)	0.64 (0.43, 0.95)	0.01	0.97 (0.94, 0.99)	0.01
Model 24	1.00 (ref)	0.89 (0.65, 1.23)	0.69 (0.48, 0.98)	0.67 (0.46, 0.96)	0.65 (0.43, 0.97)	0.01	0.97 (0.95, 0.99)	0.02
Organic plant food
Person-years	26,733	27,141	27,179	27,239	26,698
Number of cases	83	67	55	40	48
Model 35	1.00 (ref)	0.88 (0.63, 1.21)	0.74 (0.53, 1.05)	0.55 (0.38, 0.81)	0.76 (0.52, 1.10)	0.01	0.97 (0.95, 1.00)	0.03
Model 46	1.00 (ref)	0.83 (0.60, 1.16)	0.75 (0.53, 1.06)	0.52 (0.36, 0.77)	0.77 (0.53, 1.12)	0.01	0.98 (0.95, 1.00)	0.03
Organic animal food
Person-years	26,541	27,104	27,236	27,148	26,960
Number of cases	75	58	65	46	49
Model 57	1.00 (ref)	0.81 (0.57, 1.14)	0.93 (0.66, 1.30)	0.68 (0.47, 0.99)	0.84 (0.58, 1.22)	0.19	0.99 (0.96, 1.01)	0.27
Model 68	1.00 (ref)	0.77 (0.54, 1.09)	0.94 (0.67, 1.31)	0.64 (0.44, 0.93)	0.82 (0.56, 1.19)	0.15	0.99 (0.96, 1.01)	0.27

Abbreviation: Q sex-specific quintile

^*Values are Hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals), 5 points correspond to 5% of the contribution of OF to the diet

¹P for trend modeling quintile as ordinal independent variable

²P for continuous independent variable

³Model 1 is adjusted for age (time-scale), gender, familial history of diabetes, physical activity, occupation, marital status, education, monthly income per unit, smoking status, sPNNS-GS2, energy intake and alcohol consumption

⁴Model 2 is model 1 adjusted for body mass index

⁵Model 3 is model 1 adjusted for total plant food consumption

⁶Model 4 is model 3 adjusted for body mass index

⁷Model 5 is model 1 adjusted for total animal food consumption

⁸Model 6 is model 5 adjusted for body mass index