Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2020 Jul 10;22(15):5822–5827. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01895

Table 1.

Reaction Optimizationa,b

graphic file with name nihms-1643093-t0002.jpg
conversion ratio (2:3:1:4)b product yieldb,c
(%)
entry arene silver source 1 h 4 h 1 day
1d - Ag2CO3 66:34:0:0 25:40:35:0 >95 (1)
2 - Ag2CO3 61:36:3:0 39:59:2:0 98 (3)
3 5a Ag2CO3 53:45:2:0 17:78:5:0 >95 (3)
4 5b Ag2CO3 70:2:2:0 26:70:1:0 >98 (3)e
5 5c Ag2CO3 54:9:5:32 36:9:5:50 98 (4c)
6 5b AgOTf 42:0:17:20 0:0:16:15 36 (4b)
7f 5b AgOTf 0:0:32:42 0:0:52:33 54 (4b)
8f,g 5b AgOTf 0:0:40:39 0:0:24:53 71 (4b)
a

Reactions were carried out under argon with 2 (0.10 mmol) with arenes 5a-c(2.0 equiv), silver reagent [1.5 equiv in Ag(I)], and 30 mg of 4 Å molecular sieves in CDCl3 (2.0 mL).

b

NMR ratios and yields determined for the crude reaction mixture by 19F NMR with C6F6 as the internal standard.

c

NMR yields determined for the crude reaction mixture by 1H NMR with mesitylene as the internal standard.

d

Reaction carried out without 4 Å molecular sieves.

e

The reaction was also carried out at higher temperatures (up to 60 °C), and the formation of 4b was not observed.

f

Reaction carried out in anhydrous Et2O.

g

Reaction carried out at 0.3 M.