Table 3.

Proportional odds model for intent-to-adopt video consultations^a.

Predictor variables		Coefficientb	SEc	z value	P value
Age of general practitioner		−0.014	0.017	0.830	.41
Additional qualification in addiction medicine and/or psychotherapy (ref: no)		−1.002	0.545	1.837	.07
Type of practice (refd : Solo practice)
	Shared practice	−0.386	0.389	0.990	.32
	Group practice	−0.545	0.738	0.738	.46
Degree of urbanization of the area the practice was located in (ref: Cities [densely populated areas])
	Towns and suburbs (intermediate density areas)	−0.659	0.392	1.682	.09
	Rural areas (thinly populated areas)	−0.243	0.268	0.906	.37
Average number of patients per quarter (ref: <500)
	<500	0.493	0.848	−0.581	.56
	501-1000	−0.115	0.625	0.185	.85
	1001-1500	−0.195	0.378	0.518	.61
Designated room available for video consultations (ref: no)		2.025	0.345	5.876	<.001

^aNumber of observations: 788. R²: 0.33 (Cox & Snell); 0.35 (Nagelkerke); and 0.15 (McFadden). Residual deviance: 371.52 on 467 degrees of freedom. Log-likelihood: 185.76 on 467 degrees of freedom. Akaike information criterion (AIC): 397.52. Bayesian information criterion (BIC): 437.49. Intercepts not displayed.

^bNegative values indicate a lower likelihood of intent to adopt, positive values indicate a higher likelihood of intent to adopt.

^cSE: standard error.

^dref: reference category.