Table 1:

Characteristics of Included Studies (n=13)

Study	Study Design/Level of Evidence	No. of Patients	No. of Total repairs	Mean Follow-up (months)	Year of Publication	MINORS Score, %	Mean Age, range (years)	Patient Reported Outcome Scores
Accadbled et al. (2007) [1]	Case Series/IV	12	12	37	2007	56%	13 (8–16)	Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner Activity scores
Ahn et al. (2008) [3]	Case Series/IV	23	28	51	2008	88%	9 (4–15)	Lysholm, HSS scores
Hagmeijer et al. (2019) [17]	Case Series/IV	32	33	211	2019	81%	16.1 (9.9–18.7)	IKDC, Tegner Activity scores
Kraus et al. (2012) [25]	Case Series/IV	25	29	28	2012	69%	15 (4–17)	Lysholm, Tegner Activity scores
Krych et al. (2008) [26]	Case Series/IV	44	45	70	2008	81%	15.8 (9.9–18.7)	IKDC, Tegner Activity scores
Krych et al. (2010) [27]	Case Series/IV	99	99	96	2010	81%	16 (13–18)	IKDC, Tegner Activity scores
Lucas et al. (2015)[31]	Case Series/IV	17	19	22	2015	81%	14 (9–18)	Lysholm, Tegner Activity scores
Mintzer et al. (1998) [36]	Case Series/IV	26	29	60	1998	88%	15.3 (11–17)	Lysholm, IKDC, SF-36 scores
Noyes et al. (2002) [41]	Prospective Cohort Study/II	58	71	51	2002	88%	16 (9–19)	Cincinnati Knee score
Schmitt et al. (2016) [47]	Retros pective Cohort Study/IV	19	19	72	2016	81%	14.8 (9.1–16.3)	Lysholm, IKDC, KOOS, Tegner Activity scores
Tagliero et al. (2018)[53]	Case Series/IV	47	47	199	2018	75%	16	IKDC, Tegner Activity scores
Vanderhave et al. (2011)[54]	Retros pective Cohort Study/I II	45	53	27	2011	69%	13.2 (9–17)	IKDC, Tegner Activity scores
Yoo et al. (2015) [57]	Case Series/IV	19	19	56	2015	69%	10.7 (3.1–17. 5)	Lysholm score