Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Jun 29;52(4):701–709. doi: 10.1111/apt.15917

Table 3.

Correlates of response to first HCC treatment

Univariate (n=594) Multivariable (n=591)
Variable OR 95% CI aOR 95% CI
Female sex 1.57 1.13 – 2.18 1.72 1.18 – 2.53
Age 1.01 0.99 – 1.03 0.99 0.97 – 1.01
Race/ethnicity
 White Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Black 0.75 0.53 – 1.08 0.86 0.57 – 1.33
 Hispanic 0.82 0.57 – 1.19 0.89 0.58 – 1.35
 Asian 0.91 0.44 – 3.45 1.07 0.46 – 2.45
Liver disease etiology
 Viral Ref Ref
 Non-viral 1.23 0.89 – 1.70
AFP (ng/mL), n (%)
 <20 Ref Ref Ref Ref
 20–200 0.51 0.36 – 0.73 0.56 0.38 – 0.83
 >200 0.20 0.13 – 0.29 0.34 0.21 – 0.54
Child Pugh
 A Ref Ref Ref Ref
 B/C 0.59 0.44 – 0.80 0.76 0.52 – 1.10
BCLC stage
 0/A Ref Ref Ref Ref
 B 0.30 0.19 – 0.47 0.29 0.19 – 0.45
 C 0.05 0.03 – 0.09 0.15 0.07 – 0.32
 D 0.49 0.25 – 0.95 0.65 0.30 – 1.43
First HCC treatment
 Surgical Ref Ref Ref Ref
 Locoregional treatment 0.08 0.05 – 0.14 0.08 0.05 – 0.15
 Systemic therapy 0.01 0.003 – 0.01 0.02 0.01 – 0.05

Results from ordinal logistic regression model comparing complete response vs partial response vs stable disease vs progressive disease, in the subset of patients with available imaging assessment to 1st HCC treatment (n=597 of 752 treated patients). AFP – alpha-fetoprotein; BCLC - Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; HCC – hepatocellular carcinoma; OR – odds ratio