Summary of the resultsa
| PHIL 25% LV | Squid 12 | Standard PHIL 25% | P Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total procedure time (s) | 395 (310–528) | 436 (430–501) | 328 (239–479) | .386b |
| Required volume of embolic agent (mL) | 0.7 (0.7–0.9) | 0.8 (0.7–0.9) | 0.7 (0.6–0.7) | .121b |
| Visibility | 3 (3–3) | 3 (3–3) | 3 (3–3) | NA |
| Forward flow control | 5 (5–5) | 5 (5–5) | 5 (5–5) | .335b |
| Embolization extent (%) | 87.7 (68.0–100) | 64.6 (52.2–73.0) | 60.4 (27.0–75.9) | .146b |
| Reflux distance (mm) | 8 (6–8) | 6 (5–10) | 17 (14–21) | .011b |
| >.999c | ||||
| .049d | ||||
| .017e | ||||
| Events of embolization distal to the RM per procedure (No.) | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | .527b |
Note:—NA indicates that the P value was not available because all values are identical.
a
Data are presented as median (lower quartile–upper quartile).
b
Kruskal-Wallis test.
c
Post hoc Dunn test, PHIL 25% LV vs Squid 12.
d
Post hoc Dunn test, PHIL 25% LV vs standard PHIL 25%.
e
Post hoc Dunn test, Squid 12 vs. standard PHIL 25%.