Table 5: Diagnostic performance of MRA methods versus CE-CTA of the two readers.

Data are percentages; 95% confidence intervals are provided in parentheses.

Variable (%)	Sensitivity	Specificity	Positive predictive value	Negative predictive value	Accuracy
MRA methods Radial QISS-MRA
Central arteries	89.7 (72.7 – 97.8)	98.1 (94.4 – 99.6)	89.7 (73.7 – 96.4)	98.1 (94.5 – 99.3)	96.7 (93.0 – 98.8)
Lobar arteries	94.6 (89.1 – 97.8)	93.0 (88.1 – 96.3)	91.0 (85.5 – 94.6)	95.8 (91.7 – 97.9)	93.7 (90.3 – 96.1)
Peripheral arteries	84.9 (81.5 – 88.0)	92.2 (89.7 – 94.3)	90.6 (87.8 – 92.8)	87.4 (84.9 – 89.6)	88.8 (86.8 – 90.6)
All pulmonary arterial branches	86.0 (83.0 – 88.6)	93.4 (91.5 – 94.9)	89.9 (87.5 – 92.0)	90.6 (88.8 – 92.2)	90.4 (88.8 – 91.8)
Cartesian bSSFP
Central arteries	76.9 (56.4 – 91.0)	98.7 (95.4 – 99.8)	90.9 (71.3 – 97.6)	96.2 (92.6 – 98.1)	95.6 (91.4 – 98.1)
Lobar arteries	82.7 (75.0 – 88.8)	85.0 (78.8 – 89.9)	80.2 (73.7 – 85.3)	87.0 (82.0 – 90.8)	84.0 (79.4 – 88.0)
Peripheral arteries	75.6 (71.3 – 79.5)	83.8 (80.5 – 86.7)	78.4 (74.9 – 81.5)	81.5 (78.9 – 83.9)	80.2 (77.6 – 82.6)
All pulmonary arterial branches	80.6 (77.5 – 83.5)	86.6 (84.2 – 88.7)	82.5 (79.9 – 84.8)	85.1 (83.0 – 86.9)	84.0 (82.1 – 85.7)