Table 4.

ANOVA statistics and partial eta squared (η²) effect sizes for Experiment 2a: Social versus food preference was altered by food deprivation, but not social isolation in adolescent mice. Significant effects shown in bold, n.s. = none significant, BW = body weight.

	Sex	Hunger Condition	Housing Condition	Interactions
Social over Food Preference [%]	F(1,13) = 0.37, p = 0.55, η2 = 0.028	F(1,13) = 140, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.92	F(1,13) = 0.52, p = 0.48, η2 = 0.039	n.s.
Social Stimulus Investigation [sec]	F(1,13) = 4.10, p = 0.064, η2 = 0.24	F(1,13) = 7.90, p = 0.015, η2 = 0.38	F(1,13) = 0.76, p = 0.40, η2 = 0.055	Sex × Hunger × Housing: F(1,13) = 5.45, p = 0.036, η2 = 0.30
Food Stimulus Investigation [sec]	F(1,13) = 1.20, p = 0.29, η2 = 0.084	F(1,13) = 94.59, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.88	F(1,13) = 3.34, p = 0.091, η2 = 0.20	n.s.
Total Investigation [sec]	F(1,13) = 3.18, p = 0.10, η2 = 0.20	F(1,13) = 78.1,p <0.001, η2 = 0.86	F(1,13) = 4.46, p = 0.055, η2 = 0.26	n.s.
Total Distance [m]	F(1,9) = 1.40, p = 0.27, η2 = 0.14	F(1,9) = 0.81, p = 0.39, η2 = 0.082	F(1,9) = 5.55, p = 0.043, η2 = 0.38	n.s.
Middle Chamber Entries [#]	F(1,13) = 0.006, p = 0.94, η2 < 0.001	F(1,13) = 4.54, p = 0.053, η2 = 0.26	F(1,13) = 1.34, p = 0.27, η2 = 0.093	n.s.
Body Weight [% change]	F(1,13) = 0.015, p = 0.90, η2 = 0.001	F(1,13) = 1,13, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.99	F(1,13) = 8.69, p = 0.011, η2 = 0.40	n.s.
Consumption [% of BW]	F(1,13) = 15.1, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.54	F(1,13) = 344.0, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.96	F(1,13) = 2.64, p = 0.13, η2 = 117	Sex × Hunger F(1,13) = 8.63, p = 0.012, η2 = 0.40