Table 5.
ANOVA statistics and partial eta squared (η2) effect sizes for Experiment 2b: Social versus food preference was altered by food deprivation, but not social isolation in adult mice. Significant effects shown in bold, n.s. = none significant, BW = body weight.
Sex | Hunger Condition | Housing Condition | Interactions | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Social over Food Preference [%] | F(1,13) = 1.94, p = 0.19, η2 = 0.13 | F(1,13) = 44.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.78 | F(1,13) = 0.014, p = 0.91, η2 = 0.001 | n.s. |
Social Stimulus Investigation [sec] | F(1,13) = 1.86, p = 0.20, η2 = 0.13 | F(1,13) = 0.67, p = 0.43, η2 = 0.049 | F(1,13) = 0.37, p = 0.56, η2 = 0.027 | n.s. |
Food Stimulus Investigation [sec] | F(1,13) = 0.008, p = 0.93, η2 = 0.001 | F(1,13) = 41.1, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.76 | F(1,13) = 0.47, p = 0.51, η2 = 0.035 | n.s. |
Total Investigation [sec] | F(1,13) = 0.18, p = 0.68, η2 = 0.014 | F(1,13) = 43.5, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.77 | F(1,13) = 1.43, p = 0.25, η2 = 0.099 | n.s. |
Total Distance [m] | F(1,12) = 5.98, p = 0.03, η2 = 0.33 | F(1,12) = 7.90, p = 0.016, η2 = 0.40 | F(1,12) = 1.32, p = 0.27, η2 = 0.099 | n.s. |
Middle Chamber Entries [#] | F(1,13) = 12.89, p = 0.003, η2 = 0.50 | F(1,13) = 17.4, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.57 | F(1,13) = 0.06, p = 0.82, η2 = 0.004 | Hunger × Sex: F(1,13) = 4.72, p = 0.049, η2 = 0.27 |
Body Weight [% change] | F(1,13) = 0.004, p = 0.95, η2 < 0.001 | F(1,13) = 272, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.95 | F(1,13) = 0.36, p = 0.56, η2 = 0.027 | Hunger × Housing: F(1,13) = 18.4 p = 0.001, η2 = 0.59 |
Consumption [% of BW] | F(1,13) = 1.01, p = 0.33, η2 = 0.072 | F(1,13) = 147, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.92 | F(1,13) = 0.31, p = 0.59, η2 = 0.023 | n.s. |