Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2020 Sep 1;227:113162. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113162

Table 6.

ANOVA statistics and partial eta squared (η2) effect sizes for Experiment 3a: Social over food preference was greater for a novel social stimulus compared to a familiar social stimulus in adolescent rats. Significant effects shown in bold, n.s. = none significant.

Sex Social Saliency Interaction
Social over Food Preference [%] F(1,15) = 0.76, p = 0.40, η2 = 0.048 F(1,15) = 20.9, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.58 n.s.
Social Stimulus Investigation [sec] F(1,15) = 0.22, p = 0.65, η2 = 0.014 F(1,15) = 11.92, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.44 n.s
Food Stimulus Investigation [sec] F(1,15) = 0.67, p = 0.43, η2 = 0.043 F(1,15) = 0.043, p = 0.84, η2 = 0.003 n.s.
Total Investigation [sec] F(1,15) = 0.10, p = 0.75, η2 = 0.007 F(1,15) = 8.99, p = 0.009, η2 = 0.38 n.s.
Total Distance [m] F(1,15) = 1.06, p = 0.32, η2 = 0.066 F(1,15) = 0.03, p = 0.87, η2 = 0.002 n.s.
Middle Chamber Entries [#] F(1,15) = 0.08, p = 0.79, η2 = 0.005 F(1,15) = 2.33, p = 0.15, η2 = 0.13 n.s.