Table V.

Performance evaluation of the CMACS framework on the MMWHS CTA dataset using two different atlas libraries. Quantitative Dice index, 3D Hausdorff distance (HD) and mean surface distance (MSD) are calculated between the automatic and manual segmentation using two atlas libraries. Results are expressed as the median and 95% confidence interval.

n=40	Atlas	LV	LA	LVM	PA	RA	RV	AA	All
Dice	NHLBI	0.89 [0.78, 0.94]	0.91 [0.81, 0.95]	0.80 [0.68, 0.86]	0.73 [0.50, 0.89]	0.85 [0.66, 0.90]	0.84 [0.61, 0.89]	0.93 [0.86, 0.96]	0.85 [0.62, 0.95]
	MMWHS	0.88 [0.77, 0.93]	0.92 [0.84, 0.95]	0.83 [0.72, 0.88]	0.80 [0.53, 0.90]	0.84 [0.60, 0.91]	0.86† [0.73, 0.91]	0.93 [0.84, 0.96]	0.86 [0.64, 0.94]
MSD (mm)	NHLBI	1.46† [1.01, 2.72]	1.28 [0.80, 2.63]	1.51 [1.01, 3.10]	1.67 [0.86, 4.24]	2.21 [1.51, 3.84]	2.31 [1.64, 3.92]	0.71 [0.38, 1.38]	1.65 [0.62, 3.59]
	MMWHS	1.66 [1.16, 2.98]	1.15 [0.83, 2.28]	1.17† [0.73, 2.10]	1.74 [1.01, 3.47]	2.13 [1.41, 4.44]	1.68† [1.25, 3.39]	0.78 [0.43, 1.54]	1.56 [0.65, 3.36]
HD (mm)	NHLBI	8.88 [5.79, 12.4]	11.4 [6.93, 16.8]	11.4 [7.71, 17.5]	14.0 [5.79, 25.7]	13.33 [8.04, 25.9]	12.0 [7.13, 27.8]	4.52† [2.80, 8.55]	11.4 [4.0, 25.6]
	MMWHS	8.43 [6.38, 14.0]	8.91† [5.78, 17.1]	8.92 [5.07, 19.9]	7.71† [4.10, 14.0]	11.9 [6.93, 23.6]	11.0 [6.93, 25.7]	6.67 [4.10, 11.5]	9.46† [5.00, 22.7]

^†indicates significantly better performance in a higher Dice, a lower HD, or a lower MSD (p<0.05).