Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;22(11):e23482. doi: 10.2196/23482

Table 1.

Summary of study characteristics.

Study (author, year) Country Setting Study design Population Remote consultation type
Rokstad and Straand, 1997 [20] Norway Primary care practices Prospective cohort All registered patients Telephone, letter, or through a messenger (mixed)
McKinstry et al, 2002 [21] Scotland Primary care practices Randomized controlled trial All patients that phoned for a same-day appointment Telephone
Mehrotra et al, 2012 [22] United States Primary care practices Retrospective cohort All patients Text-based e-visit
Huibers et ala, 2014 [16] Denmark Out-of-hours primary care contacts Retrospective cohort All registered patients Telephone
Ewen et al, 2015 [23] United States Primary care practices Retrospective cohort All registered patients Telephone
Uscher-Pines et al, 2016 [24] United Statesb Primary care practices Retrospective cohort Adults aged 18-64 years Telephone, video, internet, or mobile app consultation (mixed)
Christensen et ala, 2016 [17] Denmark Out-of-hours primary care contacts Retrospective cohort All registered patients Telephone
Shi et al, 2018 [25] United Statesb Primary care practices Retrospective cohort Adults aged 18-64 years Audio and audio-visual conferencing (mixed)
Ray et al, 2019 [27] United Statesb Primary care practices Retrospective cohort Children aged 0-17 years Audio-only or audio-video conferencing (mixed)
Murray et al, 2019 [18] United States Primary care practices or retail clinics Retrospective cohort Women aged 18-65 years Telephone and text-based e-visit
Johnson et al, 2019 [26] United States Primary care practices Retrospective cohort Adults aged ≥18 years Text-based e-visit
Penza et al, 2020 [19] United States Primary care retail clinics Retrospective cohort Children aged 18 months-18 years Telephone and text-based e-visit

aArticles published on the same study.

bThe data were sourced from national health insurance companies. Therefore, no specific setting was recorded.