TABLE 3.
Method | Target | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
Conventional PCR | DNA/RNA | Reliable, relatively cheap | Time consuming, requires a thermocycler | Julich et al. (2011); Schwenkbier et al. (2014) |
Nested-PCR | DNA/RNA | Very specific | Expensive, time consuming, requires a thermocycler | Costa et al. (2012); Wei et al. (2018) |
Real-time PCR | DNA/RNA | Allows absolute quantification of DNA; no need of post-amplification detection | Time consuming, requires highly purified genetic material, requires a thermocycler | Tomlinson et al. (2005); Arif et al. (2013); Koo et al. (2013); Baidoo et al. (2017); Bini et al. (2018); DeShields et al. (2018); Fotiou et al. (2019) |
Digital PCR (ddPCR) | DNA/RNA | High sensitivity, resilient to contaminants, allows absolute quantification of DNA | Expensive, requires specific equipment | Selvaraj et al. (2018); Voegel and Nelson (2018); Zhong et al. (2018); Liu et al. (2019) |