Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 11;20:318. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01298-x

Table 6.

Univariate and adjusted Cox regression analysis for teeth exfoliation (n = 125)

Variable Total n (%) HR Univariate 95% CI p value HR Adjusted 95% CI p value
Group
ART (ref) 60 (92.3)
Hall Technique 65 (98.5)

1.60

1.05–2.45

0.030*

1.84

1.19–2.87

0.007*
Age (years)
5–6.9 (ref) 21 (87.5)
7–8.9 73 (93.3)

7.75

2.79–21.5

< 0.001*

8.89

3.17–24.88

< 0.001*
≥ 9 31 (96.9)

12.62

4.36–36.51

< 0.001*

17.08

5.76–50.62

< 0.001*
Sex
Male (ref) 75 (93.8)
Female 50 (98)

0.83

0.54–1.29

0.409
Jaw
Upper (ref) 76 (96.2)
Lower 49 (94.2)

1.00

0.65–1.53

0.994
Side
Right (ref) 66 (94.3)
Left 59 (96.7)

0.83

0.55–1.27

0.404
Tooth
1st primary molar (ref) 76 (92.7)
2nd primary molar 49 (100)

0.75

0.48–1.15

0.188

0.64

0.41–0.99

0.047*

HR Hazard ratio, CI confidence Interval

* Indicates statistically significance differences (p < 0.05)