Table 2:
Mixed logit model for Chicago Healthy Eating Environments and Resources (CHEERS) participant meal preferences
| Attribute | Preference estimates | Relative attribute importancea | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taste | Coefficient | 95% CI | 23.3% | |
| Very good | Mean | 1.16b | (0.97, 1.34) | |
| SD | 0.02 | (−0.59, 0.63) | ||
| Good | Mean | 0.52b | (0.35, 0.68) | |
| SD | 0.15 | (−0.70, 1.00) | ||
| OK | Mean | Reference | ||
| SD | Reference | |||
| Healthiness | 48.6% | |||
| Healthy | Mean | 2.35b | (2.12, 2.58) | |
| SD | 0.02 | (−0.55, 0.59) | ||
| Neutral | Mean | 1.53b | (1.34, 1.72) | |
| SD | 0.06 | (−0.57, 0.69) | ||
| Unhealthy | Mean | Reference | ||
| SD | Reference | |||
| Price | 9.3% | |||
| $2 increase | Mean | −0.18b | (−0.24, −0.12) | |
| SD | 0.26b | (0.01, 0.51) | ||
| Preparation time | 13.1% | |||
| 15 minute increase | Mean | −0.20b | (−0.26, −0.15) | |
| SD | 0.04 | (−0.26, 0.35) | ||
| Travel time | 5.7% | |||
| 5–10 minute increase | Mean | −0.14b | (−0.20, −0.09) | |
| SD | 0.25b | (0.004, 0.49) | ||
| Constant | Mean | −3.23b | (−4.02, −2.44) | |
a
Relative attribute importance was calculated by dividing the difference in utility between the highest and lowest level of a single attribute by the sum of the differences of all attributes
b
Attributes or attribute levels with this superscript had a significant impact on meal preferen