Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;4(21):5595–5606. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002268

Table 3.

Recurrence risk prediction models after a first unprovoked VTE

Study Type of study Predictors of VTE recurrence (vs no risk factor) VTE recurrence risk or RR, HR (95% CI), or score in model
Rodger et al 2008 (HERDOO2 derivation study)42 Prospective cohort study (1) Postthrombotic syndrome (HER) (1) Men: RR 2.54 (1.48-4.38)
(2) Elevated D-dimer on anticoagulation (1) Women: RR 3.04 (1.40-6.60)
(3) Obesity (2) Women: RR 3.02 (1.41-6.51)
(4) Older age (3) Women: RR 2.33 (1.14-4.74)
(4) Women: RR 2.26 (1.12-4.56)
Eichinger et al 2010 (Vienna prediction model)19 Prospective cohort study Male sex HR 1.91 (1.37-2.67)
Proximal vs distal DVT HR 2.76 (1.57-4.84)
PE vs distal DVT HR 3.15 (1.83-5.44)
Elevated D-dimer HR 1.24 (1.05-1.45)
Tosetto et al 2012 (DASH score)20 Patient-level meta-analysis Elevated D-dimer Score 2
Young age* Score 1
Male sex Score 1
Hormone use Score −2
Rodger et al 2017 (REVERSE; HERDOO2 rule)18 Prospective cohort management study Low-HERDOO2-risk women 3% per 100 patient years (1.8-4.8)
Men and high-risk women: 1.6% per 100 patient years (1.1-2.3)
Continued AC 8.1% per 100 patient years (5.2-11.9)
D/C AC 7.4% per 100 patient years (3.0-15.2)
High-HERDOO-risk women who D/C AC

Low HERDOO2 risk, ≤1 HERDOO2 criteria (hyperpigmentation, edema, or redness [HER] in either leg; D-dimer level ≥ 250 μg/L; obesity with body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2; or older age, ≥ 65 years).

AC, anticoagulation; D/C, discontinued; HR, hazard ratio; RR, relative risk.

*

First quartile (14-47 years) vs fourth quartile (>72 years).