Table 6. Median hedonic scores of sensory attributes of the local control varieties and the biofortified varieties with comparisons across study sites.
Country | Variety | Color | Size | Smell | Taste | Texture |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bolivia | Control 1 | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 6.0 (6, 7)a | 6.0 (5, 7)a | 6.0 (5, 7)a | 6.0 (5, 7)a |
T2-10 | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 6.0 (5, 6)b | 6.0 (5, 6)b | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 5.0 (5, 6)a | |
T2-11 | 6.0 (6, 7)a | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 6.0 (6, 7)a | 6.0 (5, 6)a | |
Colombia | Control 2 | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 5.0 (4, 6)a | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 6.0 (4, 6)a | 5.0 (3, 6)a |
021 | 6.0 (6, 6)b | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 5.0 (4, 6)b | 5.0 (4, 6)a | 5.0 (3.7, 6)a | |
035 | 6.0 (6, 6)b | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 6.0 (5, 6)a | 5.0 (4, 6)a | 5.0 (3.7, 6)a |
Values are presented as median values of individual attributes per rice variety and interquartile ranges (25, 75). Medians per column by attribute with a different superscript letter (a,b) significantly differ using Wilcoxon’s non-parametric z- test (p<0.05).