Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e17049. doi: 10.2196/17049

Table 3.

Meta-regression analyses of effect e-therapy vs controls on depression and anxiety outcomes (posttreatment and follow-up).

Time point and outcome, variable k a B coefficient 95% CI SE P valueb R2 (%)c
Posttreatment

Depression


Initial severity 26 0.07 −0.06 to 0.21 0.06 .26 4.15


Percentage of males 26 -0.01 −0.02 to 0.00 0.01 .09 8.30


Mean age (years) 26 0.00 −0.02 to 0.01 0.01 .58 0.95


Mean number of sessions completed 17 0.02 0.00 to 0.05 0.01 .08 10.23


Risk of bias 26 -0.01 −0.11 to 0.08 0.05 .77 0.28
Follow-upc

Depression


Initial severity 16 0.25 0.12 to 0.39 0.06 <.001 53.17


Percentage of males 16 -0.01 −0.03 to 0.01 0.01 .13 11.64


Mean age (years) 16 0.01 −0.01 to 0.04 0.01 .38 3.88


Mean number of sessions completed 11 0.01 −0.06 to 0.08 0.03 .78 0.44


Risk of bias 16 0.02 −0.11 to 0.14 0.06 .78 0.40
Posttreatment

Anxietyd


Initial severity 17 0.12 −0.07 to 0.31 0.09 .17 8.84


Percentage of males 17 -0.01 −0.03 to 0.01 0.01 .24 5.85


Mean age (years) 17 -0.01 −0.03 to 0.01 0.01 .43 3.03


Mean number of sessions completed 11 0.02 0.00 to 0.05 0.01 .07 23.93


Risk of bias 17 -0.01 −0.14 to 0.12 0.06 .85 0.18

ak: number of comparisons.

bAlpha threshold Bonferroni adjusted to P<.01 for multiple testing.

cInsufficient number of comparisons and limited between-study heterogeneity to warrant moderator analyses of anxiety outcomes at follow-up.

dR2: percentage of variance explained by the moderator.