Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2020 May 12;70(2):401–407. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321040

Table 3.

Hepatocellular carcinoma tumor growth patterns

Study Rapid growth n (%) Intermediate growth n (%) Indolent growth n (%)
Ebara 198629 9 (40.9) 5 (22.7) 8 (36.4)
Sheu 198519 10 (32.3) 17 (54.8) 4 (12.9)
Okazaki 198925 10 (66.7) 4 (26.7) 1 (6.7)
Yoshino 198317 7 (43.8) 7 (43.8) 2 (12.5)
Barbara 199226 8 (20.5) 20 (51.3) 11 (28.2)
Matsuhashi 199632 14 (66.7) 7 (33.3) 0
Matsuhashi 199632 2 (14.3) 12 (85.7) 0
Trere 199547 2 (10.0) 7 (35.0) 11 (55.0)
Saitoh 199530 1 (4.8) 4 (19.0) 16 (76.2)
Sadek 199548 4 (66.7) 2 (33.3) 0
Saito 199833 1 (4.8) 14 (66.7) 6 (2.9)
Kubota 200349 12 (54.5) 9 (40.9) 1 (4.5)
Nakajima 200231 21 (61.8) 12 (35.3) 1 (2.9)
Taouli 200520 4 (25.0) 8 (50.0) 4 (25.0)
Cucchetti 200522 34 (54.8) 25 (42.4) 3 (4.8)
Woo 201051 1 (20.0) 4 (80.0) 0
Villa 201421* 19 (24.4) N/A 59 (75.6)
Rowe 201423* 39 (59.1) N/A 27 (40.9)
Kim 201714* 110 (40.9) N/A 159 (59.1)
Rich 2019 primary cohort4 61 (25.2) 75 (31.0) 106 (43.8)
Rich 2019 validation cohort4* 49 (27.8) 96 (54.6) 31 (17.6)
Total 418 (35.0) 328 (27.4) 450 (37.6)
*

Study-specific definition for tumor growth patterns were used. Indolent vs. rapid defined using cut-off of 53 days for Villa 2014 and cut-off of 2 months for Kim 2017. For Rowe 2014, rapid vs. indolent defined using specific growth rate at cut-off of 1%. For Rich 2019 validation cohort, rapid, intermediate and indolent were defined as <90 days, 90–365 days, and >365 days respectively.