Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 7;47(9):753–787. doi: 10.1007/s10295-020-02296-2

Table 5.

Comparison of the most advantageous continuous fermentation methods and configurations for solvent production with solventogenic and acetogenic clostridia

Method/configuration Advantages Disadvantages References
One-stage chemostat

Maintain growth rate at defined value

Supports growth-related products

Stable gas fermentation with acetogens

Maximum growth rate limited by dilution rate

Low biomass during solvent formation

Strain degeneration and difficulty to reach steady state conditions with solventogenic clostridia

[18, 193, 319]
Multi-stage systems

Tool to stabilize biphasic fermentations

Variation of temperature, pH or nutrient supply between the stages

Higher costs for multiple reactors

Complex control

[18, 205, 247, 275, 279]
Cell retention

Uncouples dilution rate of specific growth rate

High volumetric productivity

Full control of biocatalyst concentration

Increased conversion rates

(Toxic) solvents can easily be recovered of cell-free permeate

Circulation of effluent possible

Biomass reuse lowers propagation costs

Difficult long-term operation

Costly membrane

Membrane fouling

At high-level biomass concentration operational problems (high viscosity, heavy gas formation and foaming)

Higher contamination risk of external separation

Nonselective retention (dead, non-viable cells, and substrate particles)

Requirement of cell viability monitoring

[21, 62, 161, 164, 185, 204, 222, 287, 308, 314]
Cell immobilization and biofilm reactors

Prevents washout of cells

Allows higher dilution rates

Increases reaction rates and productivity

Enhanced genetic stability

Improved inhibitor resistance of cells

Protects cells against shear forces

Uncontrolled cell growth can lead to blocking or Membrane fouling

Maintenance of cell viability and physiology

Diffusion limitation of mass-transfer

Varying microenvironment

Leaking of cells of support

Inactive or dead biomass

Reduced productivity during longer-term operation

Challenging scale-up

[11, 138, 150, 168, 179, 205, 225, 231, 275, 284, 314, 341]
Integrated product recovery

Energy-efficient at low solvent concentrations

Integration of downstream step for solvent recovery into cultivation

Operable in continuous mode

Lowers the concentration of toxic products in the broth

Decreased product inhibition

Improved substrate conversion rates, solvent yields, and productivities

In situ product recovery: culture broth does not leave the reactor

In-line method in separate recovery loop affecting the cells

In situ product recovery: limited optimization opportunities

Disadvantages dependent on product recovery method

[21, 58, 82, 161, 164, 306, 325]